DSpace Repository

Dialectica materialistă a fenomenului 3k: crimă, criminal și criminalitate

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author PRUTEAN, Serghei
dc.contributor.author LUPAȘCU, Zinaida
dc.date.accessioned 2022-01-27T17:07:58Z
dc.date.available 2022-01-27T17:07:58Z
dc.date.issued 2019
dc.identifier.citation PRUTEAN, Serghei, LUPAȘCU, Zinaida. Dialectica materialistă a fenomenului 3k: crimă, criminal și criminalitate. In: Promovarea valorilor social-economice în contextul integrării europene: mater, conf. intern., 12-13 decembrie 2019, Chisinau, Republica Moldova, 2019, pp. 43-57. ISBN 978-9975-3287-6-0. en_US
dc.identifier.isbn 978-9975-3287-6-0
dc.identifier.uri http://repository.utm.md/handle/5014/18911
dc.description.abstract Marxian philosophy looks at the world as a set of processes whose unfolding must be analyzed theoreticaly, not as a set of things that can be understood as isolated observable facts. What must be understood about a process are the inner tensions that provide the driving force behind its transformations. These intrinsic conflicts – called „contradictions” by Hegel and Marx – are source of „development” meaning not merely quantitative growth but qualitative transformation. In the language of biology, they were not explaining anatomy but evolution. In the language of physics or economics, they were not explaining statics but dynamics. In the language of sociology they were not explaining structures but processes – and in particular, they way that processes change structures. Causation, in Marx and Engels, is matter of interaction rather than a one – way mechanism. Thus there is neither pure determinism not pure chance, but instead a stream of events reflecting both „accidental” factors and underlying forces whose necessary relationships shape the general tendency of these events as a whole. The manner in which Marx and Engels sought to investigate causation was be seeking underlying patterns of internal tensions, which by definition cannot be seen directly by collecting concrete facts. Rather, the overwhelming complexities of empirical reality must be reduced to manageable proportions by abstracting those features considered essential and focusing the analysis on these. After determining the relationships and conflicts inherent in these essential features, a fuller and richer approximation to reality can be achieved by then considering some of the features initially put aside in the name of simplicity. en_US
dc.language.iso ro en_US
dc.publisher Universitatea de Studii Europene din Moldova en_US
dc.rights Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States *
dc.rights.uri http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/ *
dc.subject crime en_US
dc.subject criminal en_US
dc.subject criminalitate en_US
dc.subject materialism en_US
dc.subject economic crisis en_US
dc.subject unemployment en_US
dc.subject industrialization en_US
dc.subject criminality en_US
dc.subject legal consciousness en_US
dc.title Dialectica materialistă a fenomenului 3k: crimă, criminal și criminalitate en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

The following license files are associated with this item:

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account